<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Microsoft Ad Message &#8211; Forget Brands, All PC&#8217;s are the Same!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.acmeplex.com/2009/03/28/new-microsoft-ad-all-pcs-are-the-same/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.acmeplex.com/2009/03/28/new-microsoft-ad-all-pcs-are-the-same/</link>
	<description>Everything Will Eventually Blow Up ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 22:28:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: GQuinne</title>
		<link>http://www.acmeplex.com/2009/03/28/new-microsoft-ad-all-pcs-are-the-same/comment-page-1/#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>GQuinne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 07:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acmeplex.com/?p=5145#comment-102</guid>
		<description>You ask &quot;A solid selling point for MS &amp; Windows - but how do PC makers who spend millions/hundreds of million on branding feel about this?&quot;

Simple.  They likely feel like they should spend their *own* buck to build their brand, and should be happy that Microsoft is helping to shore up the image of the PC in general.  After all, even if they *are* miffed by the message here, its not like they can just say, &quot;Screw it, we&#039;re switching to Macs!&quot;  Apple doesn&#039;t let anyone else build machines that might even be *mistaken* as Macs (see the Hackintosh fiasco.)  So PC manufacturers can either fall in line with Microsoft, or...switch to *Nix.  

Now, I&#039;m not knocking *nix.  But your average computer user sure has no idea what the hell to do with a *nix machine, or where to buy software for it, or why to use that over a PC or a Mac.  Not to mention the total lack of advertising dollars spent to familiarize people with *nix.  

Plus, HP is getting free adspace with this commercial.  There&#039;s a certain truth to the adage that there is &quot;no such thing as bad press.&quot;

So the PC makers have three choices.  Switch to *nix (or Android, which, with Google&#039;s weight behind it, might actually not be such a bad idea), suck it up and build their brands with their own dollars, or retool their factories in order to mass produce a Cylon army whose mission it will be to give all the uptight Mac owners wedgies.

By that, I mean all Mac owners who are uptight, and in no way intend to imply that all Mac owners ARE uptight.  

To put it again, clearly, 
IF(Mac Owner)=True
  THEN(IF (Uptight)=TRUE)
    THEN WEDGIE()
ELSE End()

&lt;3</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You ask &#8220;A solid selling point for MS &amp; Windows &#8211; but how do PC makers who spend millions/hundreds of million on branding feel about this?&#8221;</p>
<p>Simple.  They likely feel like they should spend their *own* buck to build their brand, and should be happy that Microsoft is helping to shore up the image of the PC in general.  After all, even if they *are* miffed by the message here, its not like they can just say, &#8220;Screw it, we&#8217;re switching to Macs!&#8221;  Apple doesn&#8217;t let anyone else build machines that might even be *mistaken* as Macs (see the Hackintosh fiasco.)  So PC manufacturers can either fall in line with Microsoft, or&#8230;switch to *Nix.  </p>
<p>Now, I&#8217;m not knocking *nix.  But your average computer user sure has no idea what the hell to do with a *nix machine, or where to buy software for it, or why to use that over a PC or a Mac.  Not to mention the total lack of advertising dollars spent to familiarize people with *nix.  </p>
<p>Plus, HP is getting free adspace with this commercial.  There&#8217;s a certain truth to the adage that there is &#8220;no such thing as bad press.&#8221;</p>
<p>So the PC makers have three choices.  Switch to *nix (or Android, which, with Google&#8217;s weight behind it, might actually not be such a bad idea), suck it up and build their brands with their own dollars, or retool their factories in order to mass produce a Cylon army whose mission it will be to give all the uptight Mac owners wedgies.</p>
<p>By that, I mean all Mac owners who are uptight, and in no way intend to imply that all Mac owners ARE uptight.  </p>
<p>To put it again, clearly,<br />
IF(Mac Owner)=True<br />
  THEN(IF (Uptight)=TRUE)<br />
    THEN WEDGIE()<br />
ELSE End()</p>
<p>&lt;3</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aragorn_Strider</title>
		<link>http://www.acmeplex.com/2009/03/28/new-microsoft-ad-all-pcs-are-the-same/comment-page-1/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>Aragorn_Strider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 18:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acmeplex.com/?p=5145#comment-84</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s an interesting alternative take -- from Microsoft itself ...

   &quot;As you start looking closer at mice on the shelf, you&#039;ll spot the
   price tags. You might see a well-known mouse with a price of $79,
   and a brand you&#039;ve never heard of with a tag of $39. If the lesser-
   known brand is Microsoft-compatible, why should you fork out
   the extra $40 for a mouse you&#039;ve seen before?

  &quot;Brooks says Microsoft uses high-quality components that raise the
   price but make a Microsoft mouse worth the extra cash. ...

   &quot;... Brooks say the costs of Microsoft&#039;s sophisticated product
   testing and customer support systems are also passed on ...

   &quot;Scott Schulte, a product line manager at Logitech, also says you
   can&#039;t cut corners on price without giving up quality. You can be
   sure the higher price of a popular mouse accompanies higher
   quality.&quot;

That&#039;s very interesting to hear Microsoft, actuality admit to.

Aragorn Strider</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s an interesting alternative take &#8212; from Microsoft itself &#8230;</p>
<p>   &#8220;As you start looking closer at mice on the shelf, you&#8217;ll spot the<br />
   price tags. You might see a well-known mouse with a price of $79,<br />
   and a brand you&#8217;ve never heard of with a tag of $39. If the lesser-<br />
   known brand is Microsoft-compatible, why should you fork out<br />
   the extra $40 for a mouse you&#8217;ve seen before?</p>
<p>  &#8220;Brooks says Microsoft uses high-quality components that raise the<br />
   price but make a Microsoft mouse worth the extra cash. &#8230;</p>
<p>   &#8220;&#8230; Brooks say the costs of Microsoft&#8217;s sophisticated product<br />
   testing and customer support systems are also passed on &#8230;</p>
<p>   &#8220;Scott Schulte, a product line manager at Logitech, also says you<br />
   can&#8217;t cut corners on price without giving up quality. You can be<br />
   sure the higher price of a popular mouse accompanies higher<br />
   quality.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s very interesting to hear Microsoft, actuality admit to.</p>
<p>Aragorn Strider</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TooCool</title>
		<link>http://www.acmeplex.com/2009/03/28/new-microsoft-ad-all-pcs-are-the-same/comment-page-1/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>TooCool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 14:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acmeplex.com/?p=5145#comment-83</guid>
		<description>metroxing, you are right and I haven&#039;t seen other sites state as clearly as you have here that MS has dissed its hardware makers in trying to directly address Apple.

Lessons I take from the ad: (1) The Apple Store is the first place to go when you want to buy a computer. (2) If you can afford them, Apple is clearly the way to go. (3) If you have money for a premium computer, (whether Apple, Vaio, Adamo, or the like) you are cool. (4) If you have to buy HP you aren</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>metroxing, you are right and I haven&#8217;t seen other sites state as clearly as you have here that MS has dissed its hardware makers in trying to directly address Apple.</p>
<p>Lessons I take from the ad: (1) The Apple Store is the first place to go when you want to buy a computer. (2) If you can afford them, Apple is clearly the way to go. (3) If you have money for a premium computer, (whether Apple, Vaio, Adamo, or the like) you are cool. (4) If you have to buy HP you aren</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://www.acmeplex.com/2009/03/28/new-microsoft-ad-all-pcs-are-the-same/comment-page-1/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 03:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acmeplex.com/?p=5145#comment-81</guid>
		<description>I agree.  Do consumers really not know that one can find PCs at lower prices than Macs?

Anyway, it doesn&#039;t really matter for two reasons.  One, Snow Leopard (OS 10.6) will be out soon and I think it&#039;ll make a huge difference in speed.  Two, the platform that will be replacing PCs for many people is already here - it&#039;s iPhone, and Windows Mobile is nowhere near competitive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree.  Do consumers really not know that one can find PCs at lower prices than Macs?</p>
<p>Anyway, it doesn&#8217;t really matter for two reasons.  One, Snow Leopard (OS 10.6) will be out soon and I think it&#8217;ll make a huge difference in speed.  Two, the platform that will be replacing PCs for many people is already here &#8211; it&#8217;s iPhone, and Windows Mobile is nowhere near competitive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

